Case Against 2 White Doctors who were ‘Architects’ of CIA Torture of Non-Whites Headed to Jury Trial

The Psychopathic Racial Personality. According to Dr. Bobby Wright, 'by and large, white people treat each other humanely. But in their relations with non-white people, many white people function as psychopaths. The psychopath is an individual who is constantly in conflict with other persons or groups. He is unable to experience guilt, is completely selfish and callous, and has a total disregard for the rights of others.

Behavioral scientists generally agree that the outstanding characteristics of the psychopathic personality are the almost complete absence of ethical or moral development and an almost total disregard for appropriate patterns of behavior. This characteristic has led to a misunderstanding of the psychopath as someone who does not know the difference between right and wrong. This belief is not true; psychopaths simply ignore it. By ignoring this trait in Whites (the lack of ethical and moral development) Blacks have made and are still making a tragic mistake in basing the worldwide Black liberation movement on moral suasion. It is pathological for Blacks to keep attempting to use moral suasion on a people who have no morality where race is the variable.' [MORE] and [MORE]

From [HERE] A lawsuit against two racist suspect Spokane-based psychologists dubbed the “architects” of an interrogation program used on CIA detainees in 2002 will be heard by a jury in September, a federal judge ruled Friday.

The lawsuit against James Mitchell and Bruce Jensen, who were contractors for the CIA, is being brought by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of three men who were held in secret CIA facilities and interrogated for information the feds suspected they had regarding terrorist groups.

One of the men, Gul Rahman, died while being held at a CIA facility when he was short-chained to a wall in a diaper and died of hypothermia.

The other two men, Suleiman Abdullah Salim and Mohamed Amed Ben Soud, say they were tortured using methods to “instill fear and despair” including stress positions, confinements in coffin-like boxes and starvation, according to the ACLU complaint. Soud and Salim were later released after being interrogated.

The ACLU lawsuit claims Mitchell and Jensen are liable for the harm the men experienced, and the group’s lawyer recently likened their development of the interrogation program to those who supplied the Nazi regime with gas to kill prisoners at Auschwitz.

“Just like in the case of Bruno Tesh, the issue isn’t about who administered the gas,” ACLU lawyer Dror Ladin said at a hearing in an Eastern District of Washington courtroom. “What matters is if you provided the means.”

The CIA paid Mitchell and Jessen $1,800 per day to administer the torture of detainees. They ultimately earned millions for their work, both as individual contractors and through a company they created in 2005 to expand the program. By the time the CIA terminated its contract in 2010, it had paid Mitchell, Jessen & Associates more than $80 million in taxpayer money.

Click to read more ...

Court Oks Lawsuits Against Flint & State Officials for Water Contamination but Racist Suspect Governor is Exempt

From [HERE] Residents of Flint, Michigan, can pursue civil claims against the city and state municipal officers in a water-contamination suit because the Safe Drinking Water Act does not pre-empt civil rights claims, the Sixth Circuit ruled on Friday.

The appeals court found, however, that the state of Michigan is entitled to immunity.

The ruling concerns two consolidated civil suits claiming Flint began pumping water from the Flint River in April 2014 to save money, and that the water caused health problems like high levels of copper in blood, hair loss and chronic throat problems.

The two lawsuits – one filed against Flint and its city officials and the other against Michigan and state officials – had previously been dismissed for lack of jurisdiction by U.S. District Judge John Corbett O’Meara. But the three-judge Sixth Circuit panel reversed that decision and remanded the case to federal court.

“Having resolved that there is no textual indication in the SDWA that Congress expressly chose to pre-empt § 1983 claims and that the provisions of the remedial scheme do not demonstrate such an intention, we also find that the contours of the rights and protections found in the constitutional claims diverge from those provided by the SDWA such that we infer lack of congressional intention to foreclose § 1983 claims,” Circuit Judge Jane Branstetter Stranch wrote. “The defendants have not demonstrated that ‘Congress intended to abandon the rights and remedies set forth in 14th Amendment equal protection jurisprudence’ when it enacted the SDWA. Under the governing precedent, primarily that of the Supreme Court, the defendants have not carried their burden and the plaintiffs may thus move forward with their cases.”

But the panel did find the claims against Michigan and its racist suspect governor [in phooto] are barred.

Click to read more ...

Hepatitis C Lawsuit vs Missouri Prison System To Go Forward: 15% of Inmates [guinea pigs] Infected & Untreated

From [HERE] A lawsuit alleging the Missouri Department of Corrections systematically denies medical treatment to prisoners with chronic hepatitis C has taken a big leap forward after a judge certified it as a class action.

U.S. District Judge Nanette Laughrey last week ruled that the lawsuit, which was filed in December, meets all the requirements for class certification, including numerous plaintiffs and common issues of law and fact.

The ruling is significant because the class potentially includes thousands of inmates. At least 10 to 15 percent of the Missouri prison population is infected with hepatitis C, and the corrections department itself, in response to a Sunshine Act request, estimated last year that it had 5,200 inmates with hep C. The hepatitis C rate among the general population is about 1 percent.

"By not treating them, they're increasing the spread of the disease within this population," says Gillian Wilcox, a staff attorney with the ACLU of Missouri, which represents the plaintiffs. "Ninety-six percent of these people are coming back into communities."

Click to read more ...

Tennessee offers inmates shorter sentences if they submit to sterilization

From [HERE] A controversial new program, implemented for prison inmates, is raising questions. The policy, which has only been in place since May, offers to 30 days off  a sentence if the inmate submits to vasectomy or implantation of a birth control device.

So far 38 male inmates and 32 female inmates have agreed to the procedures. Since the story broke, many have  voiced concern with the unusual bargaining chip, and have called the voluntary program unethical and racist.

Judge Sam Benningfield, who signed a standing order for the program, said in a statement responding to the outrage “I hope to encourage them to take personal responsibility and give them a chance, when they do get out, to not to be burdened with children. This gives them a chance to get on their feet and make something of themselves.”

The procedures, themselves, are free and conducted by the Tennessee Department of Health. Women inmates receive a Nexplanon implant in their arm, which provides up to three years of continuous birth control. The implant, however, has also has been linked to a number of side effects, including depression, back pain, and liver disease. The male inmates that signed up for the same program would undergo a much more permanent procedure; opting to sign up for a vasectomy in exchange for their a reduced sentence.

People have are expressing shock over sterilization in exchange for shorter sentences. The Executive Director of the state’s American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Hedy Weinberg,  responded to the news, calling the arrangement “unconstitutional.” Weinberg also emphasized that such a choice “violates the fundamental constitutional right to reproductive autonomy and bodily integrity by interfering with the intimate decision of whether and when to have a child, imposing an intrusive medical procedure on individuals who are not in a position to reject it.”

While disturbing, these policies are far from the first of their kind. Eugenic programs have been systematically implemented countless of times in the history of the U.S. against those who were deemed a ‘liability’ to society, mostly under “legal” means. According to scientific records, more than a third of women in the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico were sterilized from the 1930s to the 1970s as a result of a partnership between the U.S. government, Puerto Rican lawmakers and medical officials.

Click to read more ...

Apartheid in Nazi Like Israel Includes Ethiopian Jews

From [HERE] According to the article, Zionist racism is flagrantly applied to Ethiopian Jews in Israel. Racism has peaked, here. The Israelis are the ruler of time and the Ethiopians are slaves wearing chains. 

Here, top posts and positions, precious and luxury homes are given to Israeli Jews, after their slaves made and equipped it for their Sultans. 

Many images have been published on social media that indicate Ethiopians conditions. They work really hard to make these houses in Israeli settlements, but these homes belong to white people who are opposed that the black folks have any home in their neighborhood. 

An organization affiliated to Israel’s Ministry of Health exposed another awful fact, about four years ago. It announced its opposition to blood donations from Knesset Representative, who was Ethiopian. 

Israel’s Magen David Adom which is similar to Red Cross and Red Crescent had set up a blood donation in the House of Israel. The organization told Pnina Tamano-Shata, the Knesset member, who wanted to donate her blood that they could not accept Ethiopian-born blood, according to the Ministry of Health. 

Click to read more ...

Racist Tucker Carlson on border security "Why not just build a big concrete wall with guard towers & dogs?"

[MORE]

Arpaio Guilty of Contempt: Allowed Cops to Stop & Detain Non-Whites Based Only On Belief That They Were illegal

From [HERE] Racist Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who once claimed to be “America’s toughest sheriff,” was found guilty of criminal contempt after defying a judge’s order to stop racially profiling immigrants, according to a court decision on Monday.

In her ruling, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton found Arpaio guilty of criminal contempt of the court for willfully violating a federal judge’s order. Arpaio — the former sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona between 1993 and 2016 who made life difficult for immigrants and detainees of color — faces up to six months in prison with sentencing scheduled for October 5.

The charge follows a 2011 court order by U.S. District Court Judge Murray Snow forcing Arpaio to stop racial profiling people based on the color of their skin. Arpaio’s police department was found to routinely racially profiled Latinos, by prolonging traffic stops to determine the immigration status of individuals.

The verdict rejected Arpaio’s defense that Snow’s order was unclear and that the violations were unintentional. Rather, the court cited Arpaio’s willingness to “continue to keep doing what he had been doing” even the 2012 preliminary injunction required that he stop pursuing the arrest or detention of people “merely based on the belief or suspicion, or reality, that they were here in this country illegally alone.” The court also indicated that Arpaio failed to follow up with his subordinates to see if the order was being complied with.

“Not only did Defendant abdicate responsibility, he announced to the world and to his subordinates that he was going to continue business as usual no matter who said otherwise,” the ruling pointed out.

In a public statement, Arpaio’s attorneys said he will appeal to get a jury.

Click to read more ...

[the Myth of American Progress] The Difference in Income Between Blacks & Whites is the Same as 50 yrs Ago

System of White Supremacy is a System of Vast Unequal Power. From [NYTimes] Is the white working class losing economic ground because of policies intended to improve the lives of black people? Anxiety and resentment among some white voters about those policies certainly seemed to benefit Donald Trump’s campaign last year, with its populist, ethno-nationalist message.

The problem with this belief is that it is false. The income gap between black and white working-class Americans, like the gap between black and white Americans at every income level, remains every bit as extreme as it was five decades ago. (This is also true of the income gap between Hispanic and white Americans.)

In 2015 — the most recent year for which data are available — black households at the 20th and 40th percentiles of household income earned an average of 55 percent as much as white households at those same percentiles. This is exactly the same figure as in 1967.

Indeed, five decades of household income data reveal a yawning and uncannily consistent income gap between black and white Americans across the economic spectrum. Fifty years ago, black upper-class Americans had incomes about two-thirds those of white upper-class Americans, while the black middle class — those in the 60th percentile — earned about two-thirds as much as its white counterpart. Those ratios remain the same today.

The median white household has about 13 times the wealth of the median black household — and much of that wealth is transferred between generations. This remarkable gap helps perpetuate the consequences of centuries of social and economic injustice.

These numbers should shock us. Consider that in the mid-1960s, Jim Crow practices were still being dismantled and affirmative action hardly existed. Yet a half-century of initiatives intended to combat the effects of centuries of virulent racism appear to have done nothing to ameliorate inequality between white and black America. [MORE]

[Was Michael Jackson the 1st Moonwalker?] 48th Anniversary of the Government Lying About Landing on the Moon

Propaganda. From [HERE] In photo below alleged moonwalkers Michael Collins and Buzz Aldrin came together during a gala on July 15, 2017, to celebrate the 48th anniversary of the historic Apollo 11 mission, which allegedly touched down on the lunar surface on July 20, 1969. [MORE] Based on compelling evidence, many claim it was and remains a giant hoax. 

'The sun is nobody’s property, the earth is nobody’s property, the moon is nobody’s property; the wind, the clouds, the rain – nothing is anybody’s property. But the vested interests go on drawing lines/boundaries on the maps, and over those lines they go on fighting and killing and murdering.' [MORE]

According to Dr. Blynd in FUNKTIONARY, THE KEY HOLDERS ENPSYCHLOPEDIA: 

Propaganda - a psychological technique and means by which the lawless confound the lawful (dwellers upon the land). 2) any message intended to influence whether true or false. 3) disinformation used as programming that in its absence wouldn't stand up itself nor stand up for itself by itself. The Jesuits were the ones who invented the word and the first to systematize its practice. Propaganda is memes distributed with an external anchor and an embedded carrier. Propaganda is to be used as subversion, which is the undermining or detachment of the loyalties of significant social groups and their transference to the symbols and institutions of the aggressor-oppressor. "It is a political necessity to destroy the African consciousness of colonialized Africans or African people." -Dr. Amos N. Wilson. As for the minds of the general public, the most sinister part of The Matrix in which we now live is that you have been cajoled and convinced to suppress your own free will and surrender to the manipulators who control not just your mind, but your entire reality. Edward Bernays, the father of modem propaganda, explained: "If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing it... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of... In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons— who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind." "Most people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all," -Michael Rivero. (See: Public Relations, Memes, Mind Viruses, Dance of Truth, Absolute Truth, Human Language, Memetics, Good & Evil, Confusion, False Flag Operation, Nine-Eleven, MEDIA, Propagenda, The Truth, Subvertilizers, Evolution, Religion, State, Symbolaeography, Voting, Elections, Orderlies, Corporate State, "Government," "Rolebot" & Reification)  

[the guns & dogs are for YOU] Pew Study says 49% of White Households Own a Gun, 48% of White Men Own a Gun

Keep the Piece. Racists accumulate guns while simultaneously programming Blacks to believe guns are bad & to support gun bans in our own communities. As explained by Dr. Blynd, outlawing guns is "the precursor to servitude. Banning guns to reduce crime is like guns is banning sex to reduce rape. If guns supposedly cause (or encourage) crime, why are we arming police officers?"

From [HERE] According to a new Pew Research Study about four-in-ten adults (42%) report that there is a gun in their household, with three-in-ten saying they personally own a gun and 11% saying they don’t own a gun but someone else in their household does.

Gun ownership varies considerably across demographic groups. For example, about four-in-ten men (39%) say they personally own a gun, compared with 22% of women. And while 36% of all whites report that they are gun owners, about a quarter of blacks (24%) and 15% of Hispanics say they own a gun.

White men are especially likely to be gun owners: About half (48%) say they own a gun, compared with about a quarter of white women and nonwhite men (24% each) and 16% of nonwhite women. 

The study indicates that 49% of all white households own a gun. 

Besides demographic differences, clear partisan divides emerge when it comes to gun ownership. Republicans and Republican-leaning independents are more than twice as likely as Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents to say they own a gun (44% vs. 20%). This partisan gap remains even after controlling for demographic differences

Most gun owners cite more than one reason for owning a gun, but protection tops the list, with 67% of gun owners saying this is a major reason they personally own a gun. About four-in-ten (38%) say hunting is a major reason they own a gun, while three-in-ten cite sport shooting, including target, trap and skeet shooting. Fewer gun owners cite a gun collection (13%) or their job (8%) as major reasons. [MORE] Protection from whom though?

The white researchers at Pew assert that people own guns for really "complex reasons." K. Don't let the smooth taste fool you here. Sounds like the "complicated explanations" provided offered to explain why droves of white folks voted an unqualified, unstable incompetent into the Presidency ["believers create their own deceivers"]

Another recent study by PLOS found that guns and racism are linked. More specifically, odds are greater that a racist white American also keeps a gun at home and opposes gun control regulations. In other words the fear of non-whites, especially Blacks is closely related to gun ownership. The study concluded, "symbolic racism was related to having a gun in the home and opposition to gun control policies in US whites. The findings help explain US whites’ paradoxical attitudes towards gun ownership and gun control. Such attitudes may adversely influence US gun control policy debates and decisions." [MORE] Michael Moore explained “I think we’re [white people] a very frightened people” [MORE]. 

Do White people consciously or sub-consciously fear their extinction & practice racism to survive? 

Undeceiver, Dr. Frances Cress Welsing stated, "the white global collective remains genetically recessive to the black, brown, red and yellow global majority and lives each day and each minute of every hour in the continuous fear of white annihilation by the global majority of genetic dominants.

This fundamen­tal fear of albino isolation, abandonment and genetic annihilation, is at the core of Western civilization - a civilization structured to ensure white genetic survival. This survival plan necessitates the subjugation and control of all non-white peoples. I define this subjugation and control as the white supremacy system."

"It is this same anxiety that causes Western civilization's preoccupation with weapons, spending more money on armaments than on any other single budgetary item. These weapons surround all of the world's non-white peoples. The whites hope that the weapons will prevent white genetic annihilation and thereby ensure white genetic survival, but then whites hold the pervasive attendant fear that they will be destroyed in the conflagration also." [MORE] and [MORE]

And Why Would Whites Fear Non-Whites? 

• White people suffer from numerical inadequacy (they are vastly outnumbered, 90% of the world is non-white. The white population is rapidly declining. Indeed, if white people had not created such a global system in which they established power over the world's non-white majority, the white collective would have been genetically extinct a long time ago [MORE]) and; 
• Color deficiency The global white collective maintains a different appearance from the rest of humankind, and they dislike this difference. Therefore, they tan, use makeup, [excercise obsessively and buy guns].("people of color always will have something highly visible that whites never can have or produce — the genetic factor of color. Always, in the presence of color, whites will feel genetically inferior" [MORE]) and 
• Whites are genetic recessive (When white persons intermix or have sexual relations with non-whites their offspring will be non-white. Thus, white can be replaced or made "genetically extinct". 
  • White plus Black equals Colored. 
  • White plus Brown equals Colored. 
  • White plus Yellow equals Colored.
• What is to be done about this endangerment to the survival of white people? White Supremacy. The operating system of white supremacy functions to keep them alive. 
• And despite all evidence to the contrary white people fear that non-whites would oppress them if they ever had the chance. 

People who classify themselves as White, who wish to be taken seriously, and who are righteous and responsible, will only talk about ending White Supremacy (Racism) and replacing it with Justice.

Click to read more ...

Fox News has Used Violent Gang MS-13 to 'Super Predatorize' Non-White Immigrants & Anyone Else w/ Brown Skin

Genocidal racist Tucker Carlson pretends to give a fuck about Non-White victims of violence in Non-White communities.

From [MediaMatters] Trump blamed “weak border and immigration enforcement” for  Suffolk County’s MS-13 problem

Wash. Post: In Suffolk County, Trump blamed “America’s weak border and immigration enforcement” for MS-13’s Long Island presence. The Washington Post reported that Trump used his remarks about the brutality of MS-13 -- which is blamed for 17 murders over 18 months in Long Island’s Suffolk County -- to “push Congress to boost funding for the administration's immigration crackdown,” including the construction of a border wall on the southern border, 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, 5,000 new Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) officers, harsher penalties on immigrants who enter the United States illegally, expedited deportations, and penalties for sanctuary cities. [The Washington Post, 7/28/17]

Fox News has used Suffolk County’s MS-13 problem as a justification for Trump’s “crackdown” on undocumented immigrants

Suffolk County sheriff on Fox & Friends: MS-13 is “exploiting the unaccompanied minor program.” Suffolk County Sheriff Vince DeMarco appeared on Fox & Friends and claimed that most MS-13 gang members “come here through the unaccompanied minor program and are here illegally.” Host Brian Kilmeade agreed, commenting, “They come over and oftentimes without parents. They're put in temporary homes. And they’re running wild since then.” From the July 28 edition of Fox & Friends:

BRIAN KILMEADE (CO-HOST): President Trump here heading to Long Island today, where they have seen increase in MS-13 gang activity, to show support for law enforcement officials who combat them every day and are making real progress. Here to talk about that is Suffolk County Sheriff Vincent Demarco, who is set to meet with the president at today's event. Sheriff, exciting time, the president comes out to Long Island. Sadly, he’s there because that's the heart of MS-13. What progress has been made in six months?

SHERIFF VINCENT DEMARCO: Well, about 17 people have been arrested recently. There were four murders in April. And those people were arrested last week, indicted by the Department of Justice.

KILMEADE: So we [inaudible] a ride-along about six weeks ago. And he said the sense of people on the street in the gang unit is that Homeland Security was got their back. ICE has got their back. And they are starting to deport these kids -- some cases -- and these young adults right away.

DEMARCO: Yes. MS-13 is made up of primarily teenagers, and, as you know, they are very brutal, very desensitized to violence. Most of them have come here through the unaccompanied minor program and are here illegally. They’re not meeting the conditions of the program, and they are deportable.

KILMEADE: They come over and oftentimes without parents. They're put in temporary homes. And they’re running wild since then. They intimidate other kids to join them or they get beat up or they get killed. In fact, the four that were killed, you just solved a major murder in Brentwood last week.

Click to read more ...

"Fox News Not Racist but No.1 with Racists:" 21st Century Fox Tells "The Simpsons" Creator to Tone it Down

[racists - upholders, supporters and perpetrators of the institution of the White Supremacy Dynamic. An often misunderstood term confusing bigotry (personal dislike of a clan of men and women) with that of a system of oppression (structured and perpetuated injustice—racism) by merchants and slavers (Corporate State and their bastard, equally fictitious but deadly offspring, megacorporations). (See: Bigot, Corporate State, Corporations & Person) from FUNKTIONARY]

From [HERE] "Lock him up!" That was the surprising chant heard coming from Ballroom 20 on Saturday at San Diego Comic-Con.

It was none other than Simpsons creator Matt Groening, who kicked things off when the discussion at the show's Comic-Con panel turned to, naturally, President Donald Trump. After opening with a clip of animated Trump from this past season, the conversation turned to politics when Groening revealed that they had been asked by parent company 21st Century Fox to take it easy on Fox News after a joke that dubbed Fox News "not racist, but No. 1 with racists." [MORE] Interesting b/c the show also made this joke for over 6 years ago. [MORE]

Trump Colludes with Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch is the founder of the corporate news media giants 21st Century Fox and the News Corporation. News Corp owns The Wall Street Journal and the New York Post. He unsuccessfully attempted to purchase TimeWarner, who owns CNN in 2014, who Trump claims to hate. [MORE] and [MORE] and [MORE]

Also US Atty Preet Bharara was investigating Fox News when Trump fired him. [MORE] Other media outlets under Trump's thumb are the New York Observer which is owned by Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner and The National Enquirer which is owned by David Pecker, Trump’s close friend. [MORE] TMZ also has friendly relations with the Trumps. [MORE]

Wells Fargo Forced Unwanted Auto Insurance on Borrowers: Pushed Nearly 300,00 Customers into Delinquency & Caused Car Repossessions

From [HERE] More than 800,000 people who took out car loans from Wells Fargo were charged for auto insurance they did not need, and some of them are still paying for it, according to an internal report prepared for the bank’s executives.

The expense of the unneeded insurance, which covered collision damage, pushed roughly 274,000 Wells Fargo customers into delinquency and resulted in almost 25,000 wrongful vehicle repossessions, according to the 60-page report, which was obtained by The New York Times. Among the Wells Fargo customers hurt by the practice were military service members on active duty.

Wells Fargo, one of the largest banks in the United States, is struggling to repair its image after a scandal in which its employees created millions of credit card and bank accounts that customers had never requested. That crisis, which came to a head last year, toppled Wells Fargo’s chief executive and led to millions of dollars in fines.

The bank also stands accused of having made improper adjustments to the terms of the home loans of customers who were in bankruptcy, which Wells Fargo denies.

Asked about the findings on auto insurance, Wells Fargo officials confirmed that the improper insurance practices took place and said the bank was determined to make customers whole.

We have a huge responsibility and fell short of our ideals for managing and providing oversight of the third-party vendor and our own operations,” Franklin R. Codel, the head of consumer lending at Wells Fargo, said in an interview. “We self-identified this issue, and we made the right business decisions to end the placement of the product.”

The report, which was prepared by the consulting firm Oliver Wyman, looked at insurance policies sold to Wells customers from January 2012 through July 2016. The insurance, which the bank required, was more expensive than auto insurance that customers often already had obtained on their own.

National General Insurance underwrote the policies for Wells Fargo, which began to require the insurance on auto loans as early as 2006. The practice continued until the end of September. [MORE]

Obama On Old Video Dissing Coin-Operated, Trump Probot Anthony Scaramucci - in a Presidential Way

After Tweeting About Racist White Cops will ESPN commentator Jemele Hill also Get Filtered Out of Racist System?

[MORE] 'Any act or attitude on the part of Blacks which appears to White Americans to defy White American authority, control or dominance is a problem to white folks.' [MORE] Will elite whites will now begin to officially filter out (dissapear) Ms. Hill?