Sunday, March 20, 2005 at 01:00PM
The data-collecting company has managed to avoid being bogged down by
regulations -- until maybe now. ChoicePoint Inc. was created to avoid
just the sort of mess in which it now finds itself. The nation's
biggest private collector of personal information was spun off seven
years ago from credit bureau Equifax Inc. largely to get around laws
restricting the way such bureaus sell data. Because it was not
considered a financial services company, ChoicePoint was not subject to
data laws, and for years the plan worked like a charm. Freed from
regulation, the company saw sales more than double -- and its profit
and stock price more than quadruple -- as businesses demanded more data
to manage risks and target marketing. ChoicePoint became the
quintessential Information Age company, culling all manner of sensitive
facts and figures about virtually every adult in the United States,
some 19 billion records in all. But in the wake of a security breach
that allowed a ring of identity thieves to peruse tens of thousands of
those records, ChoicePoint suddenly faces the sort of government
oversight that it and similar companies have sought to avoid. The
Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators are
investigating ChoicePoint's practices. Last week, the Senate Banking
Committee held the first in a series of congressional hearings.
Legislators and industry experts predict new regulation of ChoicePoint
and competing information brokers that compile and sell Social Security
numbers, driver's license numbers and financial histories to tens of
thousands of customers, including lenders, landlords and many of the
Fortune 500.
SAME Company that Created the Flawed Florida Felon Voter List - Wrongly Preventing Blacks from Voting in 2000 Election
ElectionChoicePoint bought Santa Ana-based
CDB Infotek in 1996, shortly before spinning off from Equifax, and
added Database Technologies Inc. in 2000. The next year, Database
Technologies came under fire for having given Florida election
officials a list of thousands of suspected felons that state officials
used to bar people from voting. The list was riddled with errors, and
many of the accused were black Democrats. At least 1,000 people were
improperly kept from voting, more than George W. Bush's margin of
victory. The NAACP sued. ChoicePoint blamed Florida officials for
asking for near-matches without making confirmation checks on their
own. ChoicePoint settled the case in 2002 and agreed to reprocess its
list of suspected ex-cons.
Los Angeles Times March 13, 2005