« Tufts students must fight Somerville gang law |
Main
| N.Y.'s high court hears 'driving while Black' case »
Thursday
Oct142004
Thursday, October 14, 2004 at 02:52AM
State Supreme Court justices decided Wednesday to review the way juries
are selected in Santa Barbara County to determine whether the process
is unconstitutional because Latinos are consistently under-represented.
The decision came in response to defense lawyer Robert Sanger's
challenge to a state appellate court ruling that jury selection here is
"race neutral" and therefore not discriminatory. It is not clear if the
Supreme Court decision means that local cases will be delayed until the
high court rules, which could take many months. Earlier, more than 60
cases had been put on hold waiting for the appellate court decision.
Justices from the 2nd District Court of Appeal had found in June that
there was no evidence that Latinos are significantly or systematically
excluded from juries here. The Court of Appeal overruled Santa Barbara
Superior Court Judge Frank Ochoa, who decided in November that the
selection process was unconstitutional. He made his decision after
considering data showing that while 14 percent of the Latino population
here is eligible to serve, juries are made up of only 7 percent to 8
percent Latinos. [more ]