« Bush Minion Ralph Reed Shakes Down Indian Tribe |
Main
| The Census Count of Prisoners is Inflating the size of Republican Districts »
Tuesday
Sep282004
Tuesday, September 28, 2004 at 06:54PM
Proponents of the measure, who include prominent
civil rights and religious organizations, call some of the punishments
meted out under three-strikes sentencing requirements "cruel and
unusual." They argue that minorities have been disproportionally
affected. And they say the state is spending tens of millions of
dollars to incarcerate petty thieves and drug addicts who are no real
threat to society. Under the law, second-strikers -- those with two
serious or violent felonies on their record -- must serve 80% of their
sentence before being considered for parole. A third conviction, or
strike, for a less serious felony can trigger a sentence of 25 years to
life. In California, 42,000 people are serving time under three
strikes, nearly as many as in all other states combined. The study,
conducted by an advocacy group that says it is committed to "ending
society's reliance on incarceration," found that 57% of third-strikers
had their 25-years-to-life sentences triggered by a nonviolent offense.
A Field Poll taken last month found nearly seven in 10 likely
California voters said they would vote to change the law, with the
numbers for both Republicans and Democrats well above the threshold for
passage. [more ]