Reparations Sought Decades After Vicious Oklahoma Race Riots by White Mobb

• Originally published on 2/13/04 in the LA Times [here]
  

A lawsuit for damages from Oklahoma and Tulsa may set the tone for a national campaign.

On February 13, 2004, 100 survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Riots and 300 of their descendants will have their day in court and chance to make their case for reparations, eight decades after a white mob tore into a thriving black neighborhood, leaving as many as 300 dead. A summary judgment hearing  on the City of Tulsa and State of Oklahoma's defenses in Alexander et al. v. State of Oklahoma will provide victims their first opportunity to argue that the city and state should proceed to trial. The lawsuit is based, in part, on a 2001 report by the Oklahoma Race Riot Commission                        which uncovered that the government was complicit in the                        race riot. A team of law professors and lawyers including                        Charles Ogletree of Harvard and Michael D. Hausfeld, a partner                        with Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., accuse                        the city and state of participating in a "conspiracy                        of silence" and seek reparations for the death of family                        members and the loss of homes and businesses.

Excerpt

A dwindling number of race-riot survivors -- some more                        than 100 years old -- will finally have a chance to make                        their case for reparations, eight decades after a white                        mob tore into a thriving black neighborhood, leaving as                        many as 300 people dead.

At a federal courthouse here this morning, lawyers representing                        more than 100 survivors and 300 descendants of victims are                        scheduled to have their first opportunity to argue that                        their lawsuit seeking damages from the city and state should                        proceed to trial. The city and state have asked Senior U.S.                        District Judge James Ellison to dismiss the suit.

Advocates on both sides see the case as a bellwether in                        the national campaign to secure reparations for descendants                        of slaves. Civil rights leaders believe it could shape the                        reparation movement's legal strategy and help persuade the                        public that society bears some responsibility for centuries-old                        offenses.

Thursday night, in anticipation of today's hearing, more                        than 250 people of various races held a vigil. One woman                        held a hand-painted sign that read,

"Tulsa: Two Cities."

The Rev. Milford Carter, one of the city's religious leaders,                        told the crowd that Tulsa had been "stunted" by                        a legacy of racism.

"God loves justice and he loves justice now,"                        he said. "From this day forward, an action begins that                        will not stop until it finds ultimate commitment. "

The vigil was held at Greenwood Cultural Center in north                        Tulsa, not far from where the violence erupted May 31, 1921.                        That day, a local newspaper carried a young white woman's                        allegation that she had been assaulted by a black teenager.                        A white lynch mob walked to the jail where the teen was                        being held and was met by a group of blacks. A shot rang                        out, and the riot began.

Thousands of whites descended on the nearby community                        of Greenwood, a bustling black neighborhood that included                        a business district known across the South as "Black                        Wall Street" because of its enterprise and success.

By the next afternoon, as many as 300 people, mostly blacks, were dead. Thirty-five square blocks of Greenwood were reduced to ash and rubble. More than 1,000 buildings, including churches and schools, were destroyed.

A city investigation concluded that the riot was a "Negro uprising." No one was ever prosecuted, nor were blacks compensated for the loss of property. Authorities also never   prosecuted the teenager on the assault claims.