You Only Believe Dallas Cops Were Killed as Payback b/c They Said So. [cops never lie] Dallas Cops Block Release of All Camera Footage from its Bomb Robot & Body Cams

False Flag Operation in Dallas? From [HERE] Dallas Police Department officials want to block the release of "highly intimate or embarrassing" information regarding the use of a bomb disposal robot to kill a sniper who murdered five officers last month, saying it is of no legitimate concern to the public.

City officials asked Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton for an advisory opinion on July 19, in response to at least 17 public information requests by journalists. The requests want access to robot and body camera footage, among other things.

Armed with a brick of C-4 explosive, the robot detonated and killed Micah Xavier Johnson, 25, of Mesquite, in the early hours of July 8 on the campus of El Centro College in downtown Dallas.

Dallas Police Chief David Brown told reporters at the time that hours-long negotiations in a garage with Johnson had failed. "Our bomb robot detonated a bomb where the suspect was," Brown said. "Other options would have subjected officers to great danger."

During the standoff at a garage, Mr. Johnson told police negotiators that “he was upset about Black Lives Matter,” Chief Brown said. “he said he was upset about the recent police shootings. The suspect said he was upset at white people. He stated he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers.” He aslo said that Johnson was singing, laughing and taunting officers during prolonged negotiations. [MORE] Thus far, no police or city camera video footage has been released to corroborate the DPD's story. Although multiple officers were present during the stand off, apparently, Brown is the only officer who has publicly spoken about what exact statements were allegedly made by Johnson. It is also unclear how police communicated to Johnson. It is unknown whether police reports or notes made in connection with the incident contained Johnson's statement.   

Police also claimed that the concept of the killing episode was planned in a “fairly voluminous” journal found in the home of Micah Johnson. While the journal did not specifically lay out plans for that assault, officials said, it "showed how the gunman planned to adapt the combat tactic." [MORE]. As far as BW knows, only the police have been able to view this secret journal of admissions. Apparently its entries contained details about so-called "shoot and move tactics" and plans about a non-specific assault at an unknown time and location? How many pages could this be? [MORE] If there were an actual trial Johnson's alleged facebook page and his murder plans journal would have to be authenticated - a witness familiar with his handwriting would have to confirm that his writing in fact was in the journal and that he in fact created the Facebook page and made entries on it (anyone can create a facebook page, anywhere).

As with other "terror" incidents in a matter of hours the case is closed - dead man's confession to cops of multiple crimes and murders, revelations about the exact location of key evidence and crime plans, loads of anecdotal information that would never be admissible in court but sounds credible on TV, unverifiable statements from anonymous neighbors, co-workers & "friends"- - and missing video, audio, notes, witnesses and forensic evidence. Here, there is also a missing dead body - since he was allegedly blown to bits by the robot bomb.    

Like the elite white media said, that's definitely "Micah X"

The detonation was the first known use of a bomb disposal robot to kill a suspect by a U.S. police department.

Authored by Assistant City Attorney P. Armstrong, the letter to Paxton argues that some of the requested information "is protected by common-law privacy," which protects information that is "highly intimate or embarrassing, such that its release would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and it is of not legitimate concern to the public."

The letter states that some of the requested information is considered confidential under the law. It also invokes "special circumstances," and the release of the information would endanger officers working undercover, Armstrong writes.

"The disclosure of the requested information that includes such information could jeopardize the safety and well-being of these officers and the confidential informants used by DPD," the letter states. "As well, it may subject them to retaliation for offenses attained from the location if this information is disclosed."

The letter says some of the requested information is protected by the Texas Homeland Security Act, since it involves operating procedures of the department's Homeland Security and Special Operations Division.

"This information is vital in coordinating and dispatching police and fire personnel to emergencies," the letter states. "As such, it is critical that DPD be able to protect information directly related to the operating procedures of this division."