Search

Subscribe   Contact   

Twitter       Facebook  

About         Archives

HEADLINES

BLACK MEDIA

 

LATEST BW ENTRIES

Login
Powered by Squarespace


Support BW!

Racist Suspect Watch


free your mind!

Cress Welsing: The Definition of Racism White Supremacy

Dr. Blynd: The Definition of Racism

Anon: What is Racism/White Supremacy?

Dr. Bobby Wright: The Psychopathic Racial Personality

The Cress Theory of Color-Confrontation and Racism (White Supremacy)

What is the First Step in Counter Racism?

Genocide: a system of white survival

The Creation of the Negro

The Mysteries of Melanin

'Racism is a behavioral system for survival'

Fear of annihilation drives white racism

Dr. Blynd: The Definition of Caucasian

Where are all the Black Jurors? 

The War Against Black Males: Black on Black Violence Caused by White Supremacy/Racism

Brazen Police Officers and the Forfeiture of Freedom

White Domination, Black Criminality

Fear of a Colored Planet Fuels Racism: Global White Population Shrinking, Less than 10%

Race is Not Real but Racism is

The True Size of Africa

What is a Nigger? 

MLK and Imaginary Freedom: Chains, Plantations, Segregation, No Longer Necessary ['Our Condition is Getting Worse']

Chomsky on "Reserving the Right to Bomb Niggers." 

A Goal of the Media is to Make White Dominance and Control Over Everything Seem Natural

"TV is reversing the evolution of the human brain." Propaganda: How You Are Being Mind Controlled And Don't Know It.

Spike Lee's Mike Tyson and Don King

"Zapsters" - Keeping what real? "Non-white People are Actors. The Most Unrealistic People on the Planet"

Black Power in a White Supremacy System

Neely Fuller Jr.: "If you don't understand racism/white supremacy, everything else that you think you understand will only confuse you"

The Image and the Christian Concept of God as a White Man

'In order for this system to work, We have to feel most free and independent when we are most enslaved, in fact we have to take our enslavement as the ultimate sign of freedom'

Why do White Americans need to criminalize significant segments of the African American population?

Who Told You that you were Black or Latino or Hispanic or Asian? White People Did

Malcolm X: "We Have a Common Enemy"

Links

Deeper than Atlantis
« How far the police can go in lying to [mostly black] suspects during interrogations? Court Weighs Police Role in Coercing Confessions | Main | African Truth of Israeli Apartheid: Gross Mistreatment in Violation of Int’l Law »
Friday
Jan172014

Despite a Guilty Plea, a Ruling Allows Black Man to Sue New York City

NYTimes

A federal appeals court ruled on Thursday that a man whose 1998 conviction for the attempted murder and attempted robbery of a Bronx livery cab driver was reversed but who later pleaded guilty to a lesser charge could still sue the city for violating his rights.

The plaintiff, Michael Poventud, 43, who had said he was innocent, served nine years in prison before his conviction was vacated in 2005 on grounds that the authorities had not disclosed evidence to his lawyers that could have helped his defense.

Rather than undergo a retrial, he pleaded guilty to attempted robbery in the third degree and acknowledged that he had been armed and present at the scene of the crime. He was given a one-year sentence and was immediately released from prison.

But a judge dismissed a lawsuit he filed on grounds it was legally prohibited because of his guilty plea.

On Thursday, in a ruling that revealed heated debate among judges and touched on philosophical questions about the search for truth in the justice system, the appeals court held that Mr. Poventud’s plea did not preclude him from seeking damages from those he accused of violating his right to a fair trial.

“Poventud’s claims are not the stuff of prison idleness or self-absorption,” Judge Richard C. Wesley of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit wrote, adding that Mr. Poventud had succeeded in having his conviction overturned because of “a constitutional infirmity.”

The appeals court, which usually rules through three-judge panels, ruled 2 to 1 in April in favor of Mr. Poventud. In a rare step, the full, or “en banc,” court then took up the matter, with 15 judges participating in the ruling on Thursday.

Judge Wesley wrote the majority opinion, which was joined by eight other judges. A 10th concurred and dissented in part. Five other judges dissented. Six opinions were issued.

“They’re all wresting with the challenges of a system that doesn’t always know the truth and where trials aren’t always fair and huge incentives are offered to plead guilty,” said Daniel C. Richman, a law professor at Columbia University.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.