Thousands of black farmers who say they have been left out of a landmark civil rights case are turning to Congress as their last hope to get compensation for years of being denied loans by the government. "This is not discrimination that took place in the 1950s. That discrimination is taking place right now, and it took place a few years ago for me, in 1996," said John W. Boyd Jr., a Virginia farmer who is president of the National Black Farmers Association. "Congress needs to help us fix this." Rep. Steve Chabot (R-Ohio), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee's subcommittee on the Constitution, planned a hearing today in Cincinnati on the settlement. Chabot said a legislative solution was being considered. Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), meanwhile, was continuing to work with the Agriculture Department to find a possible administrative fix, his office said. In the 1999 case, the department agreed to pay $50,000 or more to each farmer who filed for compensation within six months. About 13,500 people have qualified for more than $830 million under this settlement. But the Environmental Working Group and Boyd's association say as many as 66,000 black farmers missed out because they were improperly notified of the settlement and, thus, filed late claims. Lawyers for some of the farmers say they notified their clients, but the farmers did not file for damages because they did not believe the government would pay them. A judge last month rejected an effort by the farmers to reopen the settlement and allow those farmers' cases to be heard. However, U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman in Washington left room in his decision for Congress to act. "In this particular situation, Congress is going to have to pass legislation to allow those persons who were deemed ineligible to be eligible under the law," said James W. Myart Jr., the lead lawyer.