By Walter Ewing, Immigration Impact

From [HERE] Nativists are fond of grandstanding over the plight of minority workers in the United States. While not particularly concerned with civil-rights issues, anti-immigrant activists are quick to cast themselves as defenders of the downtrodden when they blame immigrants for the high unemployment rates and low wages that are all too common among minorities. For instance, a recent hearing of the House Immigration Policy and Enforcement Subcommittee, entitled “Making Immigration Work for American Minorities,” featured a number of nativist stalwarts who claimed to have the best interests of minorities at heart as they held immigrants responsible for virtually every socioeconomic ill to befall minority communities. However, the best available evidence indicates that immigration is not the cause of dismal employment prospects and poor wages for American minorities. 

Data from the 2009 American Community Survey, analyzed for the IPC by Rob Paral and Associates, show no correlation between African American unemployment and the size of the foreign-born population in U.S. metropolitan areas. African American unemployment rates in many low-immigration cities are actually far greater than in many high-immigration cities. For instance, immigrants were 17.6 percent of the population in Miami in 2009, but only 3.1 percent of the population in Toledo. Yet the unemployment rate for African Americans in Toledo (30.1 percent) was much higher than that of African Americans in Miami (17.6 percent). This should come as no surprise; immigrants go where jobs are more plentiful.

The grim job market which confronts many minority workers is created by economic and social factors that have nothing to do with immigration. According to Yale University economist Gerald D. Jaynes, the impact on less-educated native-born workers of competition with immigrant workers “is swamped by a constellation of other factors (such as declining factory jobs and other blue-collar employment).” Similarly,Manuel Pastor of the University of California, Santa Cruz, concludes that there are factors far more significant than immigration contributing to unemployment and low wages among African American men, such as “the rising level of skill requirements of jobs, racial discrimination, and spatial mismatch between the location of employment opportunities and residential locations of blacks.”

The most recent economic research indicates that immigration actually produces a slight increase in wages for the vast majority of native-born workers. This occurs in two ways. First, immigrants and natives tend to have different levels of education, work in different occupations, and possess different skills. The jobs which immigrants and natives perform are frequently interdependent. This increases the productivity of natives, which increases their wages. Second, the addition of immigrant workers to the labor force stimulates investment as new restaurants and stores open, new homes are built, etc. This increases the demand for labor, which exerts upward pressure on wages.

The wage increase which native-born workers experience as a result of immigration is very small, but it is an increase. A 2010 report from the Economic Policy Institute estimated that, from 1994 to 2007, immigration increased the wages of native-born workers by 0.4 percent. Native-born African Americans experienced an average wage increase of 0.4 percent as well, which was nearly the same as the 0.5 percent increase among native-born whites.

Immigrants also create jobs as consumers and entrepreneurs. Immigrant workers buyfood, clothes, appliances, cars, etc. from U.S. businesses. And businesses respond to the presence of new workers and consumers by investing in new restaurants, stores, and production facilities. Moreover, immigrants are 30 percent more likely than the native-born to start their own business. The end result is more jobs for more workers. As economist Giovanni Peri of the University of California, Davis, concludes, “immigrants expand the U.S. economy’s productive capacity, stimulate investment, and promote specialization that in the long run boosts productivity,” and “there is no evidence that these effects take place at the expense of jobs for workers born in the United States.”