Doubt arises over woman's credentials in $650 million deal
A $650 million deal to compensate thousands of African American
farmers, who alleged bias in U.S. Department of Agriculture programs,
could unravel because a Santa Cruz woman worked as a federal attorney
on the settlement without ever passing the bar, officials said
Saturday. The woman, Margaret O'Shea, 38, also has been charged with
grand theft after working for the Monterey County public defender's
office earlier this year defending indigents accused of crimes. The
county is reviewing all 83 cases she handled there in a three-week
period and might dismiss some of them because defendants and court
officials mistakenly thought O'Shea was a licensed attorney. An Ohio
congressman and two national organizations of black farmers have asked
the U.S. Justice Department to investigate O'Shea and her follow-up
work on a landmark 1999 settlement, Pigford vs. Glickman. The deal has
led to thousands of African American farmers receiving funds -- but
critics said most claimants were denied aid by federal officials,
including O'Shea, who reviewed the claims. The Justice Department also
appealed all rulings by an arbitrator that favored farmers. O'Shea
might have worked on those appeals. "They are looking into exactly what
her role was in the Glickman-Pigford settlement," said Todd Lindgren,
spokesman for U.S. Rep Steve Chabot, R-Ohio, chair of the House
Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on the Constitution. "In the bigger
scheme of things, there appear to be major problems with the Pigford
settlement, particularly implementation." [more]
Article originally appeared on (http://brownwatch.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.