Arizona: Litigation could enforce English-only proposition
Wednesday, December 22, 2004 at 09:11PM
TheSpook
Public educators in Payson and around the state are often the subjects
of a dissatisfied minority who question the efforts and tax money that
create language acquisition programs for students with limited English
fluency. A pending lawsuit, filed Monday in federal court, could give
these opponents something to really crow about. Tim Hogan, of the
Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest, filed the motion to
force Arizona into providing supplies, special tutoring and
well-trained teachers for students learning English. If Hogan is
successful, the legislature would be forced to provide the money
schools need to educate students who are learning English. Some said
that when Arizona voters overwhelming passed Proposition 203 two years
ago, the "English Only" measure would ban bilingual education for
children learning English as a second language. At the time the
initiative passed, those working in English immersion programs at
public schools rightfully contended that Proposition 203 was an
exercise in micromanaging schools through the electoral process. Lisa
Graham-Keegan, Arizona's superintendent of public instruction at the
time, was the among the first to jump on the Proposition 203 bandwagon,
saying she was going to work with all schools in the state to develop
an orderly transition process to an all-English curriculum. As much as
the former superintendent and other educators wanted to dictate
guidelines for teaching language acquisition programs, Proposition 203
hasn't completely dismantled all bilingual options. [more]
Article originally appeared on (http://brownwatch.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.