Attorneys: Injured would face doomsday scenario
One day, a child could lose both legs due to medical negligence, but
because of Georgia's civil laws, couldn't find a lawyer to take his
case. Or a stay-at-home mother could die due to a doctor's error, but
the maximum her family could recover in noneconomic damages due to
Georgia's medical malpractice laws would be $250,000. This is the
gloomy doomsday scenario that trial lawyers predict if drastic changes
proposed to Georgia's civil, personal injury and medical malpractice
laws are passed by the 2005 General Assembly. Many lawyers believe the
proposed tort reforms in a Senate bill would lower the quality of
Georgia's justice system by restricting citizens' constitutional right
to access the courts and to a jury trial. Legal changes could make it
economically unfeasible for lawyers on contingency to take medical
malpractice cases, lawyers say. "That's the great promise of the
country: that everyone's individual rights are entitled to protection,"
said Rob Reinhardt Jr., president of the State Bar of Georgia and a
Tifton lawyer. Across Georgia, some of the state's more than 30,000
lawyers are mobilizing for what they consider to be one of the biggest
fights, not just for their profession, but for access to justice.
According to Bill Clark, the chief lobbyist for the Georgia Trial
Lawyers Association, his group will for the first time mount a public
relations campaign to educate citizens about what tort reform means to
them. [more]
Article originally appeared on (http://brownwatch.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.