Former Alameda Prosecutor Testifes that DA's Office Excluded Black & Jewish Jurors as a Standard Practice
- Originally published in The Recorder on March 23, 2005 Copyright 2005 ALM Properties, Inc.
By Warren Lutz
SAN
JOSE - With his credibility on the line, a former prosecutor at the
center of a death penalty probe began his testimony Tuesday smiling,
confident and looking dapper. But by mid-afternoon, John "Jack" Quatman
- who said he colluded with now-deceased Alameda County Judge Stanley
Golde to keep Jews off a capital punishment case - was forced to admit
he broke the law.
Nearly two years after
his stunning declaration, Quatman - who spent 25 years in the Alameda
County district attorney's office - is finally filling in the blanks.
He took the stand Tuesday in an evidentiary hearing ordered by the
California Supreme Court in the appeal of death row inmate Fred
Freeman, convicted of robbery and murder in 1987.
In
his declaration, Quatman, now a defense attorney in Whitefish, Mont.,
said Golde told him he "could not have a Jew" on Freeman's jury and
recalled that the DA's office had a "standard practice" of excluding
Jews and black women from juries in death cases because it was thought that they would not vote for death.
The district attorney's office has vehemently denied those assertions.
During
cross-exam Tuesday, Quatman conceded that he was upset with the
district attorney's office about being transferred off the DA's "death
team" in 1993, adding weight to Chief Assistant Attorney General George
Williamson's argument that Quatman has made his allegations because he
has a grudge. He also acknowledged that it's "common knowledge that
[District Attorney] Tom Orloff and I, from way back when we were
deputies, weren't friends."
Whether
Quatman is to be believed will be up to Santa Clara County Superior
Court Judge Kevin Murphy, appointed by the state Supreme Court to
conduct the evidential hearing. Murphy must answer two questions: Did
Golde really advise Quatman to boot Jews off the jury, and did Quatman
actually follow through?
Quatman said he
used peremptory challenges against three possible Freeman jurors with
Jewish-sounding last names. Williamson got Quatman to acknowledge he
didn't particularly like the candidates anyway because of their views
on the death penalty.
He also got Quatman to admit fault for booting the potential jurors.
"You knew you were in violation of the law, is that a fair statement?"
"It's a fair statement," Quatman said.
"You wanted to win?" Williamson asked.
"That's correct," he said.
Quatman
described his relationship with Golde, who died in 1998, as both
personal and professional. He said he invited Golde to his wedding in
1980.
"Judge Golde's courtroom was like no other courtroom I'd been in," Quatman said. "His chambers were like a bazaar."
"There
were always people in there. Some of them were drinking coffee, some
were reading the newspaper," he said. "There were times I sat on the
windowsill to have a spot."
Quatman said
that Golde - who while personally against the death penalty possibly
sent more people to die than any other judge in the state's history -
was seen as a mentor to young attorneys.
"[He]
had a 25- to 30-cup coffee pot going all the time," Quatman said,
measuring the height - about a foot and a half - with his hands. "It
was one of those big pots. ... It wasn't a coffee pot, it was a big
urn."
Wearing a charcoal suit with blue
stripes, the diminutive Quatman smiled often and shook hands with
colleagues during a mid-morning court break following his direct
testimony, led by Habeas Corpus Resource Center attorney Gary Sowards.
Under Williamson's cross-examination, however, Quatman grew somewhat unsteady.
Quatman
testified he was not happy at being transferred to another division
after being disciplined for using a "vulgarity" against another
assistant DA, and that he may have told other people he was upset about
being reassigned.
Murphy kept a tight
hold on the proceedings, forbidding both sides from introducing
testimony beyond the scope of the high court's directives.
But
he did allow the testimony of Stephen Thaman, a former public defender
who represented Christopher Teddy Day, convicted in a capital
punishment case in Golde's courtroom immediately preceding the Freeman
case. Thaman testified Golde gave attorneys in the Day case five extra
peremptory challenges as "freebies."
Quatman
said he received "freebies" in the Freeman case, too, but declined to
use them. It was then that he was called into Golde's chambers, he
said, and admonished for not utilizing them.
"'Quatman,
what are you doing?'" he recalled the judge saying before telling him a
Jew would never send someone to the gas chamber.
The case is
In re Fred Freeman, S122590. The evidentiary hearing is scheduled to continue today.