All Public Housing Does Not Have to be Concentrated in Poor Neighborhoods: Md. Public Housing Suit Returns to Court
Saturday, April 9, 2005 at 05:45PM
TheSpook
A 10-year-old lawsuit over racial
discrimination in Baltimore public housing is returning to court after
the parties failed to negotiate on how to desegregate. U.S. District
Judge Marvin Garbis ruled in January that desegregation should be
accomplished by spreading the poor across the region, but he didn't say
how that would be done. He referred the case to a magistrate judge to
oversee an out-of-court settlement. However, Garbis rescinded his
referral late Wednesday. He said the magistrate judge had advised the
court that "not all of the parties were willing to engage in a
substantial discussion" and meaningful negotiation had not occurred.
The lawsuit was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union against
the Baltimore Housing Authority and the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development in 1995. In an interview, Magistrate Judge James K.
Bredar declined to identify the party that he said had not fully
participated in the settlement talks. Garbis set a pretrial conference
for Thursday. The failed negotiations could mean another trial would
decide remedies that could involve providing chances for black public
housing residents to move to the suburbs. Mayor Martin O'Malley and
leaders from several counties have spoken against any remedy that would
involve the possible movement of city public housing residents to the
suburbs. Andrew D. Freeman, an attorney working with the ACLU on the
case, blamed failed talks on HUD and attorneys for the Justice
Department, which is representing the federal housing agency. "HUD and
the Justice Department have indicated they are not interested in
settling the case," Freeman told The (Baltimore) Sun. [more] and [more] and [more]
Article originally appeared on (http://brownwatch.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.