Fake war on Terror: Appeals Court Closes Arguments in Sibel Edmonds FBI Case
Friday, April 22, 2005 at 05:45PM
TheSpook
A federal appeals court is barring the
public from arguments in the case of a fired FBI contractor whose
lawsuit was thrown out of a lower court when the Bush administration
invoked the state secrets privilege. Sibel Edmonds's allegations of
security breaches and alleged misconduct at the FBI have been aired on
Capitol Hill and in a 35-page report by the Justice Department's
inspector general. Nonetheless, on the eve of a session before a
three-judge panel, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit notified her lawyers that the case would be heard in
secret Thursday. Briefs in the case were publicly filed. "It's
unprecedented and outrageous for the court of appeals to close the
argument and it serves no proper purpose to keep the public out," said
one of Edmonds' lawyers, Arthur Spitzer of the American Civil Liberties
Union. The court acted on its own, not at the request of the
government, Spitzer said he was told. The ACLU challenged the closed
hearing and was supported by media organizations including The
Associated Press. Two private groups, the Project on Government
Oversight and Public Citizen, also joined the effort. The three appeals
court judges who were to hear the case are Douglas Ginsburg and David
Sentelle, appointees from the Reagan era; and Karen LeCraft Henderson,
who was appointed a federal judge during the Reagan era and elevated to
the appeals court by President Bush's father in 1990. [more]
Article originally appeared on (http://brownwatch.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.