Cincinnati's police watchdog
agency released a list in November of 23 police officers with the most
citizen complaints against them as part of stepped-up effort to help
identify possible problem officers. But two months later, authorities
still aren't quite sure what to do with the report. Because many of the
complaints made to the Citizen Complaint Authority could not be
substantiated, police say the list could be counterproductive - and
could discourage officers from aggressively pursuing drug dealers and
violent criminals. The report identified officers with complaints from
10 or more people. The list includes complaints dating back, in some
cases, to January 2000. The report also lists 32 people who filed at
least three complaints against officers between 2000 and September
2004. The purpose of the report was to help officials identify possible
problems in the Police Department and right them before they
compounded, resulting in strained police-community relations or
lawsuits. The report is the first released under a 2002 settlement on
racial profiling that required the complaint authority to identify
patterns of complaints against officers. "The idea was, if you're going
to have police accountability measures taken seriously, you ought not
assume that each complaint is isolated," said attorney Alphonse
Gerhardstein, who represented plaintiffs in the class-action lawsuit
that resulted in the settlement. "The fact that an officer has a lot of
complaints, it suggests that there's a whole lot of people who don't
see his conduct as fair." [more]
Article originally appeared on (http://brownwatch.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.