Unenforceable racial covenants have lingering legacy in Kansas City Area
Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 10:35PM
TheSpook
Kim Wrench loves the 2½-story modern colonial he bought in the Country
Club District more than 15 years ago, but he hates its dirty little
secret. Buried in Section 10 of the Greenway Fields homeowner's
association rules — tucked between sections on outbuildings and
pergolas — are these words: “None of the said lots shall be conveyed
to, used, owned nor occupied by Negroes as owner or tenants.” Wrench,
who is black, tries to ignore the words that are known in legal circles
as a “restrictive covenant.” But he can't. “It's ridiculous that it
even has to be on there,” Wrench said. “I look at it as being a form of
ignorance and stupidity.” Although many Kansas City area residents are
not even aware of them, more than 1,200 documents involving thousands
of homes still contain racist language banning blacks, Jews and other
ethnic groups. For the first half of the 20th century, racially
restrictive covenants were routinely recorded in plats and deeds and
placed in many homeowner's association documents not only here, but
nationwide. Yet many of the covenants never were removed, even after
being ruled unenforceable by the U.S. Supreme Court as long ago as 1948
and banned by the Fair Housing Act of 1968. And their vestiges of
discrimination — a kind of “curse of the covenant” — still linger
locally, The Kansas City Star has found. Indeed, the latest U.S. census
figures show that, while some of the metropolitan areas that had racial
restrictions are now integrated, many of those neighborhoods still have
few, if any, black residents living in them today. [more]
Article originally appeared on (http://brownwatch.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.