The Meathead Proposition: 2+2 is 5, the World is Flat; Whatever Bush Says the Republicans Agree
Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 07:56PM
TheSpook
Another Irrefutable Argument Against Privatizing Social Security
Try to forgive my obsession, but here is another proof that
President Bush's designs for Social Security cannot work. This one's
not mine. I first heard it from the actor and liberal activist Rob
Reiner. Like the argument I have been hawking (see
www.latimes.com/proof), this one doesn't merely suggest that Bush is
making bad policy. It demonstrates with near-mathematical certainty
that the idea he endorses can't work. Period. Bush might as well
be proposing legislation that two plus two is five. And if that
happened, there would be no shortage of Republicans prepared to endorse
this view, experts on arithmetic to declare that it is a very difficult
question, research to indicate that the answer may lie anywhere between
2.3 and 7.09, moderate Washington sages to urge caution, media to
report both sides of the question, and media critics to accuse the
media of a subtle bias in favor of two plus two is four. The
Meathead Proposition (in honor of Reiner's most famous role) is this.
The case that there is a Social Security crisis and the proposal to
address it through "personal retirement accounts" both depend on
assumptions about the course of the economy over the next few decades.
These assumptions are highly speculative, but that's okay. What's not
okay is to assume one thing when you claim there is a problem and
something different when you claim that you've got the solution.
Actually, Bush abruptly gave up his claim that privatization will solve
the problem of a looming shortfall in Social Security funds. The truth
is that privatization schemes assume that the shortfall will be
addressed -- by borrowing trillions of dollars -- as part of the
"transition" to privatization. But Bush still claims that letting
people keep and invest for themselves part of what they now pay into
Social Security during their working years will leave them better off
than if they get the benefits they are now entitled to. How much better
off depends on how much your government benefits will be reduced for
every dollar you choose to keep and invest for yourself. That is one of
the little details the White House hasn't yet enlightened us about. But
this new system as a whole -- Social Security plus the private accounts
-- must somehow produce more money than Social Security alone, or there
is no point. [more]
Article originally appeared on (http://brownwatch.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.