Federal Judge seeks accord in HUD housing bias case in Baltimore
Saturday, January 22, 2005 at 06:47PM
TheSpook
Housing Projects Do NOT have to be ALL in Low Income Minority Neighborhoods
Saying an "agreed resolution" was preferable to more protracted
litigation, a federal judge named a former Maryland attorney general
and a former state legislator Tuesday to help craft a settlement in a
decadelong housing discrimination case. But if an agreement isn't
reached, U.S. District Judge Marvin J. Garbis said that he will hold
hearings in July to decide a remedy for his finding this month that the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development violated fair housing
laws by failing to take a regional approach to the desegregation of
public housing in Baltimore. The Housing Settlement Advisory Panel will
be led by former Maryland Attorney General Stephen H. Sachs and former
state Del. Anne S. Perkins Garbis set July 18 as the date for a bench trial to
determine what HUD should do to remedy the effects of its past actions.
"There is a chance for the parties, by
agreement, to take a significant step towards a greater degree of
racial fairness and societal equity." In pushing the parties toward a
possible agreement, Garbis is following a pattern in similar housing
cases around the country, in which a settlement was reached after a
judge had issued a finding of liability but before the court mandated a
solution. The Baltimore case began in 1995, when the American Civil
Liberties Union filed suit on behalf of the city's African-American
public housing residents, contending that the city and the federal
government failed to dismantle the segregated system of public housing
they put in place in the city in the 1930s and 1940s. [more] and [more]
Article originally appeared on (http://brownwatch.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.