A lawsuit by the American Civil
Liberties Union seeks access to public records involving the arrests
last summer of more than 400 illegal immigrants in Riverside and San
Bernardino counties. In June, a small group of Temecula-based Border
Patrol agents set off a panic among immigrants by beginning to patrol
and arrest people in cities far north of the border, including Corona
and Ontario. The next month, the ACLU filed a Freedom of Information
Act request seeking information about whether the Border Patrol was
acting lawfully. The organization asked for details about the people
involved and their interactions with the Border Patrol, methods used
during the sweeps, records of involvement by local and state law
enforcement, and communications approving the patrols. Legally, the
agency had 20 days to respond. It did not answer until September, when
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection wrote back to say it could not
process requests "on a timely basis" because of a large number of
requests and limited resources. The letter did not say if or when the
records would be released. "As a result of Customs and Border
Protection's violation of its duties under the Freedom of Information
Act, the public's wide-ranging questions about the raids of June 2004
-- including why the raids occurred, whether they were in fact
authorized, and whether people's constitutional rights were violated --
remain unanswered," ACLU staff attorney Ranjana Natarajan wrote. Border
Patrol officials did not respond to phone calls requesting comment.
When word of the patrols spread in June, some residents in heavily
Latino neighborhoods said they were afraid to go out in public and
denounced the stops as racial profiling. Agents said that the
deportations were routine and that the arrests resulted from consensual
conversations between agents and members of the public. [more]
Article originally appeared on (http://brownwatch.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.