Secretary General Kofi Annan's reluctance to commit staff members to
Iraq in large numbers and a series of comments he has made about the
war have strained relations with the Bush administration and left many
Americans bewildered, according to both supporters and critics of the
United Nations. Mr. Annan withdrew international staff members from
Iraq in October 2003 in the wake of attacks on relief workers and the
bombing of the United Nations' Baghdad headquarters, which killed 22
people, including the mission chief, Sergio Vieira de Mello. Although
the United Nations has been assigned the task of setting up elections
scheduled for January, Mr. Annan has declined to send more than a
handful of electoral workers to Iraq, citing the lack of security
forces to protect them. "The Iraqis and the Americans are completely
frustrated," said a senior American official at the United Nations,
reporting views he said he heard in the White House this week. "The
secretary general is still recommending many thousands of peacekeepers
in Sierra Leone and the Congo, and yet there are seven election workers
in Iraq. That tells the whole story." This official said that warnings
were resurfacing at the White House that the United Nations was risking
becoming irrelevant and that such comments were now being combined with
a dismissive attitude toward Mr. Annan himself. [more]
Article originally appeared on (http://brownwatch.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.