Judge denounces mandatory minimums for drug crimes near schools
Wednesday, November 17, 2004 at 05:57PM
TheSpook
One of Massachusetts' top judges denounced the state's sentencing laws
Monday, saying that the mandatory two-year sentence for drug possession
near schools discriminates against minorities, does not deter crime and
decreases faith in the judicial system. Robert A. Mulligan, who became
the chief justice for administration and management in October 2003,
said that 90 percent of the people who receive the mandatory sentences
for possessing drugs within 1,000 feet of the school are minorities.
''I'm not saying that minorities are being targeted, and I'm not saying
that the arresting officers are unfair, but I'm saying that the policy
itself is not wise,'' Mulligan told the Associated Press. ''The policy
has a discriminatory effect.'' The 1989 law, passed at the urging of
then-Gov. Michael Dukakis, has had the greatest impact in urban
settings, Mulligan said, because there are few areas in any
Massachusetts cities that are not within 1,000 feet of a school. In
Boston, Mulligan said, ''unless you're on the tarmac of Logan Airport,
you're within 1,000 feet of a school.'' ''The purpose behind school
zones is to keep drugs away from schools and that's a legitimate
purpose,'' Mulligan said. ''But school doesn't have to be in session,
it can be at night, it can be during the summer. So it doesn't really
achieve its goals.'' [more]
Article originally appeared on (http://brownwatch.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.