Schwarzenegger erred in his rebuke of mascot bill
Tuesday, September 28, 2004 at 06:46PM
TheSpook
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger should have done his homework on the origin of the word ?Redskin' before nixing a bill that would ban the use of the offensive name on five school campuses in California. His reasoning, that "Decisions regarding athletic team names, nicknames or mascots should be retained at the local level" -- doesn't address the very real issue of racism involved here. We're all in support of local control -- but this is not a local control issue -- it's an issue of prejudice. Since it doesn't look like the governor opened his history book -- or the Google search engine -- before making his decision -- we decided to do the research for him: At one time in our not so distant past, there was a bounty on the heads of the Indian people. Along with animal skins, they would bring along Indian scalps to barter at the trading posts. Red skins -- get it? It means a dead Indian's scalp. There's no getting around the true meaning -- it's a part of a notorious time in our country's history. At its most basic level, and according to Webster's New World College Dictionary, 'redskin' is defined as: an American Indian: now considered by many to be an offensive term. A few hundred pages later, you find the word "whitey" -- a white person or white people collectively: a usually hostile term of contempt. [more ]
Article originally appeared on (http://brownwatch.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.