The email sent will contain a link to this article, the article title, and an article excerpt (if available). For security reasons, your IP address will also be included in the sent email.
A man whom prosecutors say was tortured while handcuffed by an Orange County sheriff's deputy wants more than $5 million in damages, alleging that the deputy repeatedly used a Taser on him without provocation. Criminal charges were dropped in April against Deputy Christopher Hibbs, 45, of Corona, over the treatment of Ignacio Gomez Lares of Santa Ana after a jury deadlocked on whether Hibbs used excessive force in the Sept. 13, 2007, incident. Prosecutors blamed the mistrial on a "code of silence" among deputies, suggesting other deputies protected Hibbs in their testimony.
Hibbs, though, remains on paid administrative leave pending an internal Sheriff's Department probe.
In a federal lawsuit filed Friday, Lares claims that Hibbs stunned him as "corporal punishment/torture" for running away from police officers.
Prosecutors have said the incident began when Hibbs and a deputy trainee spotted Ignacio Gomez Lares, wearing a trench coat and holding a beer bottle, as he walked down Ball Road toward Brookhurst Street, near the border of Stanton and Anaheim, around 2 a.m. Hibbs pulled over the patrol car, and got out and asked to search Lares, prosecutors have said. Lares said no, according to prosecutors, and got into a physical fight with the deputy. Hibbs was knocked to the ground, and Lares ran away.
Lares' lawsuit, filed by Newport Beach attorney Jerry Steering, says two deputies began searching Lares without good cause before Lares ran away. Hibbs caught up to Lares, and then stunned him in the neck with an "X-26" Taser for about 35 seconds, the lawsuit says. Lares claims he was not resisting Hibbs.
"While tasing Lares … defendant Hibbs was screaming at Lares to 'stop resisting'; not because Lares was 'resisting,' but because Hibbs was torturing Lares in public, and wanted to make sure that anyone seeing his torturing of Lares would be under the impression that there was some sort of legitimate reason" for the use of the stun gun, according to the lawsuit.